Manufacturing AI Voice Agents: Automate Production Scheduling & Supply Chain Coordination 2025

Last Updated: November 5, 2025
Reading Time: 36 minutes
Author: Neuratel Manufacturing Solutions Team

---

Executive Summary

Manufacturing operations teams spend 15-25 hours per week on repetitive phone calls that could be automated.

Production scheduling updates. Supply chain status checks. Maintenance request routing. Quality control alerts. Vendor coordination.

These calls follow predictable patterns—perfect for AI voice agents.

Neuratel's Manufacturing Implementation:

We Build. We Launch. We Maintain. You Monitor. You Control.

• ✓ We Build: Custom AI voice agent for your facility (production scheduling, supply chain status, maintenance routing, quality alerts, vendor coordination)
• ✓ We Launch: 7-14 day implementation with ERP/MES integration (SAP, Oracle, Epicor, etc.)
• ✓ We Maintain: Ongoing optimization to achieve 92-96% accuracy included
• ✓ You Monitor: Dashboard showing calls handled, coordination time saved, accuracy metrics
• ✓ You Control: Month-to-month pricing, no long-term contracts, cancel anytime

The Reality:

• Manual coordination: 15-25 hours/week per operations manager
• With Neuratel's AI voice agents: 2-3 hours/week (87% reduction handled by our system)
• Implementation time: 7-14 days (our team handles everything)
• Accuracy rate: 92-96% for structured manufacturing workflows
• Annual savings: $89K-$340K depending on facility size

What You'll Learn:

• 5 critical manufacturing use cases Neuratel automates (production scheduling, supply chain, quality control, maintenance, vendor management)
• How Neuratel's implementation process works (day-by-day for 14 days)
• ROI calculator for 3 facility sizes (small 50-employee, medium 200-employee, large 500+ employee)
• Integration requirements our team handles (ERP systems, MES platforms, maintenance management)
• 3 real case studies from Neuratel manufacturing implementations
• Common mistakes and how Neuratel prevents them

Reddit Validation:

"Engineers shouldn't be firefighting simple scheduling questions—kills productivity." (126 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

"Supply chain calls consume 40% of my day. Zero value-add." (89 upvotes, r/supplychain)

"Implemented AI for production status calls. Team productivity up 34% in 60 days." (67 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

This guide shows how Neuratel's implementation process works for 40+ manufacturing facilities.

---

◉ Key Takeaways

• 15-25 hours per week saved per operations manager (87% reduction in repetitive call handling)
• 5 critical use cases: Production scheduling (35%), Supply chain (28%), Quality control (15%), Maintenance (12%), Vendor coordination (10%)
• 92-96% accuracy rate for structured manufacturing workflows (appointment scheduling, status updates, routing requests)
• 7-14 day implementation for basic automation (full deployment in 30 days with optimization)
• $89K-$340K annual savings depending on facility size (50-employee vs 500+ employee facility)
• "Press 0 for human" required for complex technical issues—not all queries are automatable
• ERP integration is MANDATORY—no manual data entry between systems
• Start with production scheduling (highest volume, most predictable) NOT quality control (most complex)
• Common mistake: Trying to automate technical troubleshooting first (requires human expertise)
• Success pattern: Automate information requests, route complex issues to specialists

---

▸ Manufacturing Call Volume Analysis

Where Your Operations Team Spends Time

Based on 40+ manufacturing facility implementations:

Call Type	Volume %	Avg Duration	Automation Rate	Complexity
Production scheduling updates	35%	3-4 min	94%	Low
Supply chain status checks	28%	4-5 min	92%	Low-Medium
Quality control alerts	15%	5-7 min	78%	Medium-High
Maintenance requests	12%	3-4 min	96%	Low
Vendor coordination	10%	6-8 min	85%	Medium

Key Insights:

1. 63% of calls are low-complexity information requests (scheduling updates + maintenance requests)
2. Supply chain status checks take 4-5 minutes but follow predictable patterns
3. Quality control alerts need human review but AI can triage and route appropriately
4. Vendor coordination varies significantly (routine purchase orders vs technical negotiations)

The Pattern: Manufacturing environments have higher call volume than most industries but more structured workflows (defined processes, clear escalation paths, documented procedures).

This structure makes AI voice agents exceptionally effective when properly configured.

---

🏭 5 Critical Manufacturing Use Cases

Use Case 1: Production Scheduling Updates (35% of calls)

The Problem:

Production managers receive 20-40 calls per day asking:

• "When will order #12345 be ready?"
• "Is Line 3 running today?"
• "What's the status of Job #67890?"
• "Can we expedite order #54321?"

Manual Process:

1. Receive call (30-60 seconds)
2. Look up order in ERP system (60-90 seconds)
3. Check production schedule (30-60 seconds)
4. Communicate status (60-90 seconds)
5. Document call if needed (30-60 seconds)

Total time: 3-4 minutes per call × 20-40 calls = 60-160 minutes daily

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Call Flow:

AI: "Thank you for calling [Company] production scheduling. 
     How can I help you today?"

Caller: "I need status on order 12345."

AI: [Queries ERP system in real-time]
    "Order 12345 for 500 units of Widget-X is currently in 
     production on Line 2. Expected completion is Thursday, 
     November 7th at 2 PM. Would you like me to set up a 
     notification when it's ready for pickup?"

Caller: "Yes, please."

AI: "I've set up a text notification to [phone number] when 
     order 12345 is complete. You'll also receive an email 
     confirmation. Is there anything else I can help with?"

Caller: "No, that's all."

AI: "Thank you for calling. Have a great day."

Information Retrieved:

• Order number and customer details
• Current production line assignment
• Expected completion date and time
• Quality control status
• Shipping/pickup information

Handling Time: 90-120 seconds (vs 3-4 minutes manual)

Accuracy: 96% for standard status inquiries

Integration Requirements:

• ERP system API (SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, Epicor)
• Production scheduling software (if separate from ERP)
• Real-time production data feed

When to Transfer to Human:

• Expedite requests requiring schedule changes
• Custom order modifications
• Technical production issues
• Quality concerns requiring immediate attention

Reddit Validation:

"Production managers shouldn't be phone receptionists. $95K/year salary answering 'when is my order ready' calls is insane." (178 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

Result: 94% automation rate, 60-90 minutes saved daily per production manager

---

Use Case 2: Supply Chain Status Checks (28% of calls)

The Problem:

Supply chain coordinators field 15-30 calls per day:

• "Where is shipment #ABC123?"
• "When will raw materials arrive?"
• "Has Purchase Order #45678 shipped?"
• "What's causing the delay on our order?"

Manual Process:

1. Receive call (30-60 seconds)
2. Look up shipment tracking (90-120 seconds)
3. Check carrier website/system (60-90 seconds)
4. Explain status and next steps (90-120 seconds)
5. Send follow-up email if requested (60-90 seconds)

Total time: 4-5 minutes per call × 15-30 calls = 60-150 minutes daily

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Call Flow:

AI: "Thank you for calling [Company] supply chain. I can help 
     you track shipments, check purchase order status, or 
     answer questions about deliveries. What do you need?"

Caller: "I'm looking for shipment ABC123."

AI: [Queries shipping system + carrier API]
    "Shipment ABC123 departed our facility on November 3rd via 
     FedEx. Current status: In transit, expected delivery 
     November 6th by 5 PM to [destination]. The shipment 
     contains 250 units of Part #789. Would you like the 
     FedEx tracking number?"

Caller: "Yes, and can you text it to me?"

AI: "I've sent tracking number 1Z9999999999999999 to [phone]. 
     You can also track at fedex.com. Anything else?"

Caller: "No, thanks."

AI: "Thank you for calling. Have a great day."

Information Retrieved:

• Shipment tracking number
• Current carrier and location
• Expected delivery date/time
• Contents and quantities
• Any delays or issues
• POD (Proof of Delivery) if delivered

Handling Time: 2-3 minutes (vs 4-5 minutes manual)

Accuracy: 92% for standard tracking inquiries

Integration Requirements:

• Shipping/logistics software (ShipStation, Freightview, 3PL systems)
• Carrier APIs (FedEx, UPS, DHL, freight carriers)
• Purchase order system (often within ERP)
• Inventory management system

When to Transfer to Human:

• Lost or damaged shipment claims
• Expedite requests requiring carrier negotiation
• International customs issues
• Complex routing changes

Reddit Validation:

"Supply chain calls are 80% 'where's my stuff' and 20% actual problem-solving. Automate the 80%." (89 upvotes, r/supplychain)

Result: 92% automation rate, 55-85 minutes saved daily per supply chain coordinator

---

Use Case 3: Quality Control Alerts (15% of calls)

The Problem:

Quality control managers receive 10-20 calls per day:

• "We found defects in batch #456—who do I contact?"
• "Need to report non-conformance on order #789"
• "Incoming inspection failed—what's the process?"
• "Customer returned product, claims quality issue"

Manual Process:

1. Receive call (30-60 seconds)
2. Gather defect details (120-180 seconds)
3. Create quality incident ticket (90-120 seconds)
4. Route to appropriate QC specialist (60-90 seconds)
5. Confirm next steps with caller (60-90 seconds)

Total time: 5-7 minutes per call × 10-20 calls = 50-140 minutes daily

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Call Flow:

AI: "Quality control hotline. I can help you report defects, 
     check quality hold status, or route urgent quality issues. 
     What do you need?"

Caller: "I need to report defects in batch 456."

AI: "I'll create a quality incident report. What type of defect?"

Caller: "Dimensional out of spec."

AI: "How many units are affected?"

Caller: "About 50 out of 200 in the batch."

AI: "What's the specific dimension issue?"

Caller: "Part thickness is 2.8mm, should be 2.5mm ±0.1mm."

AI: [Creates quality incident in QMS]
    "I've created incident QC-2025-1147 for batch 456. 
     Dimensional non-conformance affecting 50 units. 
     I'm routing this to QC Specialist Sarah Chen—she'll 
     contact you within 30 minutes at [phone]. I've also 
     placed the batch on quality hold in the system. 
     Your reference number is QC-2025-1147. Anything else?"

Caller: "No, that's all."

AI: "Sarah will contact you shortly. Thank you."

Information Captured:

• Batch or lot number
• Defect type and severity
• Quantity affected
• Specific measurements or observations
• Reporter contact information
• Photos/documentation (if available via MMS)

Handling Time: 4-5 minutes (vs 5-7 minutes manual)

Accuracy: 78% for complete incident capture (22% need human clarification)

Integration Requirements:

• Quality Management System (QMS)
• ERP system (for batch/lot lookup)
• Ticketing system (Jira, ServiceNow, custom)
• Production scheduling (for quality holds)

When to Transfer to Human:

• Safety-critical defects requiring immediate action
• Regulatory reportable incidents
• Complex root cause discussions
• Customer escalations

Reddit Validation:

"Quality incidents need documentation, not phone tag. AI captures details while I focus on root cause analysis." (67 upvotes, r/qualityengineering)

Result: 78% automation rate (triage + documentation), 40-70 minutes saved daily per QC manager

---

Use Case 4: Maintenance Requests (12% of calls)

The Problem:

Maintenance coordinators handle 8-15 calls per day:

• "Machine 7 is down—need urgent repair"
• "Preventive maintenance due for Line 4"
• "HVAC not working in warehouse section B"
• "Safety equipment inspection needed"

Manual Process:

1. Receive call (30-60 seconds)
2. Identify equipment and location (60-90 seconds)
3. Assess urgency level (30-60 seconds)
4. Create work order in CMMS (90-120 seconds)
5. Assign to appropriate technician (60-90 seconds)
6. Confirm timeline with caller (30-60 seconds)

Total time: 3-4 minutes per call × 8-15 calls = 24-60 minutes daily

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Call Flow:

AI: "Maintenance hotline. For urgent equipment failures, say 
     'emergency.' For routine requests, I can help you create 
     a work order. What do you need?"

Caller: "Machine 7 in Building A is down."

AI: "I've identified CNC Machine 7, Building A, Production Floor. 
     What's the issue?"

Caller: "Spindle won't start. Error code E-47."

AI: "Is production stopped because of this?"

Caller: "Yes, we're down."

AI: [Creates urgent work order in CMMS]
    "I've created emergency work order M-2025-5689 for CNC 
     Machine 7, spindle failure, error E-47. Priority: URGENT. 
     I'm paging on-call technician Mike Rodriguez now. 
     Expected response time: 15 minutes. I've also notified 
     Production Manager Sarah about the line stoppage. 
     Your work order number is M-2025-5689. Stay by the machine—
     Mike will call you at this number when he's en route."

Caller: "Okay, thanks."

AI: "Mike is on his way. Thank you."

Information Captured:

• Equipment ID and location
• Problem description and error codes
• Urgency level (emergency/urgent/routine)
• Impact on production
• Safety concerns if applicable
• Photos of issue (via MMS if available)

Handling Time: 2-3 minutes (vs 3-4 minutes manual)

Accuracy: 96% for work order creation and routing

Integration Requirements:

• CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System)
• Equipment database with asset IDs
• Paging/notification system for on-call technicians
• Production scheduling (for downtime impact)
• Safety management system (for hazard escalation)

When to Transfer to Human:

• Life-safety emergencies (fire, chemical spill, injury)
• Complex diagnostics requiring technical discussion
• Parts ordering requiring approval
• Contractor coordination

Reddit Validation:

"Maintenance requests should be captured instantly, not after a game of phone tag. AI work orders mean faster response times." (89 upvotes, r/maintenance)

Result: 96% automation rate, 20-40 minutes saved daily per maintenance coordinator

---

Use Case 5: Vendor Coordination (10% of calls)

The Problem:

Purchasing managers receive 6-12 calls per day:

• "What's the status of our purchase order?"
• "Can you expedite delivery?"
• "Need to confirm pricing on quote #123"
• "Schedule delivery appointment"

Manual Process:

1. Receive call (30-60 seconds)
2. Look up PO or quote (60-90 seconds)
3. Check delivery schedule (60-90 seconds)
4. Coordinate with receiving dock (60-90 seconds if needed)
5. Confirm details with vendor (60-90 seconds)
6. Update systems (60-90 seconds)

Total time: 6-8 minutes per call × 6-12 calls = 36-96 minutes daily

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Call Flow:

AI: "Vendor coordination line. I can help with purchase order 
     status, schedule deliveries, or answer questions about 
     quotes. How can I help?"

Caller: "I need to schedule delivery for PO-45678."

AI: [Queries purchasing system]
    "PO-45678 for 500 units of Part XYZ-789, approved on 
     November 1st. What's your preferred delivery date?"

Caller: "This Friday, November 8th."

AI: "Morning or afternoon?"

Caller: "Morning, between 8 and 10 AM."

AI: [Checks receiving dock schedule]
    "Friday November 8th, 8-10 AM is available at Receiving 
     Dock 3. I'm scheduling your delivery now. You'll need 
     to provide packing slip matching PO-45678. The dock 
     supervisor is James Wilson, extension 2847 if you need 
     to contact him. I've sent a confirmation email to 
     [vendor email]. Your delivery appointment confirmation 
     number is DEL-2025-3456."

Caller: "Perfect, thank you."

AI: "See you Friday morning. Have a great day."

Information Managed:

• Purchase order status and details
• Delivery scheduling and dock availability
• Quote pricing confirmation
• Vendor contact information updates
• Payment status inquiries
• Documentation requirements

Handling Time: 4-5 minutes (vs 6-8 minutes manual)

Accuracy: 85% for routine coordination (15% need negotiation/approval)

Integration Requirements:

• Purchasing/ERP system
• Receiving dock scheduling software
• Vendor portal (if applicable)
• Email notification system
• Document management system

When to Transfer to Human:

• Price negotiations
• Contract discussions
• Quality issues requiring vendor accountability
• New vendor onboarding
• Payment disputes

Reddit Validation:

"Vendor calls are predictable. Automate the scheduling, escalate the negotiations." (56 upvotes, r/procurement)

Result: 85% automation rate, 30-60 minutes saved daily per purchasing manager

---

$ ROI Calculator: Manufacturing AI Voice Agents

Small Manufacturing Facility (50 employees)

Current State:

• Operations manager: 15 hrs/week on calls ($65K salary)
• Supply chain coordinator: 10 hrs/week ($55K salary)
• Maintenance coordinator: 5 hrs/week ($50K salary)
• Total labor cost for calls: $17,680/year

Manual Process Costs:

• Labor: $17,680/year
• Productivity loss (task switching): $8,500/year
• Errors from missed calls: $4,200/year
• Total annual cost: $30,380/year

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Implementation Costs:

• Platform setup fee: $2,500 (one-time)
• ERP/CMMS integration: $3,000 (one-time)
• Training and configuration: $1,500 (one-time)
• Total first-year setup: $7,000

Ongoing Costs:

• Platform subscription: $499/month = $5,988/year
• Usage fees (estimated 800 calls/month): $200/month = $2,400/year
• Support and maintenance: $150/month = $1,800/year
• Total annual ongoing: $10,188/year

Benefits:

• Labor savings (87% reduction): $15,381/year
• Productivity improvement: $7,395/year
• Error reduction: $3,654/year
• Faster response times: $5,200/year (prevents production delays)
• Total annual benefits: $31,630/year

ROI Calculation:

• Year 1 net benefit: $31,630 - $17,188 = $14,442
• Year 1 ROI: 84%
• Break-even: 6.5 months
• Years 2-5 annual benefit: $21,442/year

5-Year Total Savings: $89,120

---

Medium Manufacturing Facility (200 employees)

Current State:

• 2 operations managers: 20 hrs/week each ($70K salary each)
• 2 supply chain coordinators: 15 hrs/week each ($60K salary each)
• 2 maintenance coordinators: 8 hrs/week each ($55K salary each)
• Total labor cost for calls: $53,040/year

Manual Process Costs:

• Labor: $53,040/year
• Productivity loss: $25,600/year
• Errors from missed calls: $12,800/year
• Production delays from slow response: $18,500/year
• Total annual cost: $109,940/year

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Implementation Costs:

• Platform setup fee: $5,000 (one-time)
• ERP/CMMS integration: $8,000 (one-time)
• Training and configuration: $4,000 (one-time)
• Total first-year setup: $17,000

Ongoing Costs:

• Platform subscription: $899/month = $10,788/year
• Usage fees (estimated 2,400 calls/month): $600/month = $7,200/year
• Support and maintenance: $300/month = $3,600/year
• Total annual ongoing: $21,588/year

Benefits:

• Labor savings (87% reduction): $46,145/year
• Productivity improvement: $22,272/year
• Error reduction: $11,136/year
• Production delay prevention: $16,095/year
• Total annual benefits: $95,648/year

ROI Calculation:

• Year 1 net benefit: $95,648 - $38,588 = $57,060
• Year 1 ROI: 148%
• Break-even: 4.8 months
• Years 2-5 annual benefit: $74,060/year

5-Year Total Savings: $353,300

---

Large Manufacturing Facility (500+ employees)

Current State:

• 4 operations managers: 25 hrs/week each ($75K salary each)
• 4 supply chain coordinators: 20 hrs/week each ($65K salary each)
• 3 maintenance coordinators: 12 hrs/week each ($60K salary each)
• 2 QC managers: 10 hrs/week each ($70K salary each)
• Total labor cost for calls: $163,800/year

Manual Process Costs:

• Labor: $163,800/year
• Productivity loss: $78,500/year
• Errors from missed calls: $38,900/year
• Production delays from slow response: $52,400/year
• Total annual cost: $333,600/year

AI Voice Agent Solution:

Implementation Costs:

• Platform setup fee: $10,000 (one-time)
• ERP/CMMS/QMS integration: $18,000 (one-time)
• Training and configuration: $8,000 (one-time)
• Custom workflow development: $6,000 (one-time)
• Total first-year setup: $42,000

Ongoing Costs:

• Platform subscription: $1,499/month = $17,988/year
• Usage fees (estimated 6,000 calls/month): $1,500/month = $18,000/year
• Support and maintenance: $600/month = $7,200/year
• Optimization and training: $300/month = $3,600/year
• Total annual ongoing: $46,788/year

Benefits:

• Labor savings (87% reduction): $142,506/year
• Productivity improvement: $68,295/year
• Error reduction: $33,843/year
• Production delay prevention: $45,588/year
• Total annual benefits: $290,232/year

ROI Calculation:

• Year 1 net benefit: $290,232 - $88,788 = $201,444
• Year 1 ROI: 227%
• Break-even: 3.3 months
• Years 2-5 annual benefit: $243,444/year

5-Year Total Savings: $1,175,220

---

◫ Implementation Timeline: 14-Day Manufacturing Deployment

Phase 1: Discovery & Setup (Days 1-3)

Day 1: Requirements Gathering (3-4 hours)

Morning (2 hours):

• Use case prioritization (45 min)

  • Review call volume data by type
  • Identify top 3 highest-volume use cases
  • Define success criteria for each

• System inventory (45 min)

  • Document ERP system (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics, Epicor)
  • Identify CMMS platform
  • Review existing integrations
  • List phone system infrastructure

• Team alignment (30 min)

  • Assign IT lead (API access, integration testing)
  • Assign Operations lead (workflow design, testing)
  • Assign Subject matter experts (one per use case)
  • Define communication plan

Afternoon (90 minutes):

• Platform demo (45 min)

  • Live call flow examples
  • Admin dashboard walkthrough
  • Integration capabilities review

• Technical planning (45 min)

  • API access provisioning
  • Phone number setup (new or forwarding)
  • Security protocol review
  • Implementation roadmap agreement

Day 1 Deliverables:

✓ Prioritized use case list (top 3)
✓ System integration requirements documented
✓ Team roles assigned
✓ API access provisioned
✓ Day-by-day timeline agreed

---

Day 2: ERP Integration Setup (4-6 hours)

Technical Work:

• ERP API connection (2-3 hours)

  • Create API credentials
  • Test authentication
  • Map data fields (orders, customers, production schedules)
  • Establish real-time query capability

• CMMS integration (1-2 hours)

  • Connect maintenance management system
  • Map equipment/asset IDs
  • Test work order creation
  • Configure technician paging

• Phone system integration (1 hour)

  • Port or forward phone numbers
  • Configure IVR routing
  • Test inbound call handling
  • Set up recording and transcription

Day 2 Deliverables:

✓ ERP API connected and tested
✓ CMMS integration functional
✓ Phone system receiving calls
✓ Test environment ready

---

Day 3: Workflow Design (3-4 hours)

Collaborative Session:

• Production scheduling workflow (60 min)

  • Define call flow structure
  • Script AI responses
  • Identify data points to query
  • Set escalation triggers

• Supply chain workflow (60 min)

  • Design shipment tracking flow
  • Configure carrier API lookups
  • Script delivery scheduling logic
  • Define human transfer conditions

• Maintenance workflow (60 min)

  • Create urgency triage logic
  • Design work order capture
  • Configure paging rules
  • Set emergency escalation path

Day 3 Deliverables:

✓ 3 workflows designed and documented
✓ AI scripts written for each use case
✓ Escalation rules defined
✓ Test scenarios prepared

---

Phase 2: Build & Test (Days 4-7)

Day 4-5: AI Training & Configuration (6-8 hours total)

Technical Implementation:

• Intent recognition training (2-3 hours)

  • Upload sample conversations
  • Train AI on manufacturing terminology
  • Configure industry-specific vocabulary
  • Test intent classification accuracy

• Response generation (2-3 hours)

  • Configure dynamic responses based on ERP data
  • Set up personalization (customer names, order details)
  • Test various query types
  • Optimize response clarity

• Integration testing (2 hours)

  • Test ERP data retrieval (order status, inventory)
  • Verify CMMS work order creation
  • Validate carrier tracking API calls
  • Confirm real-time data accuracy

Days 4-5 Deliverables:

✓ AI trained on manufacturing vocabulary
✓ Intent recognition ≥85% accuracy
✓ Dynamic responses configured
✓ All integrations tested and validated

---

Day 6-7: Internal Testing (4-6 hours total)

Testing Protocol:

• Operations team testing (2-3 hours)

  • Each team member makes 10-15 test calls
  • Test all three workflows
  • Document issues and edge cases
  • Rate AI performance (accuracy, helpfulness)

• Subject matter expert review (1-2 hours)

  • Production manager tests scheduling queries
  • Supply chain coordinator tests tracking
  • Maintenance lead tests work order creation
  • Provide feedback on responses

• Refinement based on feedback (1-2 hours)

  • Adjust scripts based on real usage
  • Fix misunderstood intents
  • Improve response clarity
  • Add missing escalation paths

Days 6-7 Deliverables:

✓ 50+ test calls completed
✓ All workflows validated by SMEs
✓ Edge cases identified and handled
✓ AI accuracy ≥90% on test scenarios

---

Phase 3: Pilot Launch (Days 8-10)

Day 8: Soft Launch (Pilot Group)

Pilot Strategy:

• 20% traffic routing (first 6 hours)
  • Route 1 in 5 calls to AI voice agent
  • Monitor live calls in real-time
  • IT lead and Operations lead on standby
  • Collect immediate feedback

Monitoring Focus:

• Intent recognition accuracy
• Transfer rate to humans
• Caller satisfaction (post-call survey)
• System performance and latency
• Integration reliability

Pilot Group:

• Internal staff (production managers, coordinators)
• Select trusted vendors
• Friendly customers (if applicable)

Day 8 Results Target:

• 15-25 live calls handled
• ≥85% successful completion
• <20% transfer rate
• No critical errors

---

Day 9: Expanded Pilot

50% traffic routing:

• Increase to half of inbound calls
• Continue real-time monitoring
• Operations team handles escalations
• Collect post-call feedback

Performance Review:

• Analyze 50+ pilot calls
• Identify patterns in transfers
• Review caller satisfaction scores
• Document improvement areas

Optimization:

• Adjust scripts based on real usage
• Refine escalation triggers
• Improve response wording
• Add frequently asked questions

Day 9 Results Target:

• 50-80 live calls handled
• ≥90% successful completion
• <15% transfer rate
• 4.0+/5.0 caller satisfaction

---

Day 10: Full Pilot Assessment

100% traffic routing (select use cases):

• All production scheduling calls to AI
• All supply chain tracking calls to AI
• Maintenance calls to AI (with low threshold for escalation)

Data Analysis:

• Review all pilot calls (150-200+ calls)
• Calculate final accuracy metrics
• Measure time savings
• Assess caller satisfaction
• Identify remaining issues

Go/No-Go Decision:

• If metrics meet targets → Proceed to full launch
• If issues remain → Extend pilot, address gaps

Day 10 Deliverables:

✓ 150-200 pilot calls completed
✓ Performance metrics calculated
✓ Caller feedback collected
✓ Go-live decision made

---

Phase 4: Full Launch & Optimization (Days 11-14)

Day 11: Full Launch

100% traffic routing (all use cases):

• Production scheduling: 100% to AI
• Supply chain tracking: 100% to AI
• Maintenance requests: 100% to AI
• Quality control: 50% triage to AI
• Vendor coordination: 75% to AI

Launch Day Monitoring:

• Real-time call monitoring (first 4 hours)
• Rapid response to any issues
• Team debrief at end of day
• Celebrate the win!

Day 11 Target:

• 100-150 calls handled
• ≥92% successful completion
• <12% transfer rate
• 4.2+/5.0 caller satisfaction

---

Days 12-14: Optimization Phase

Continuous Improvement:

• Daily performance reviews (30 min/day)

  • Review previous day's calls
  • Identify patterns in failures
  • Optimize scripts and flows
  • Add new intents as needed

• Team feedback sessions (1 hour total)

  • Operations team shares observations
  • Callers provide feedback
  • Document improvement requests
  • Prioritize enhancements

• Advanced configuration (2-3 hours)

  • Add more complex workflows
  • Improve personalization
  • Optimize response times
  • Enhance reporting

Week 2 Results:

• 500-800 calls handled
• ≥94% successful completion
• <10% transfer rate
• 4.4+/5.0 caller satisfaction
• 15-20 hours/week labor savings

Day 14 Deliverables:

✓ Full production launch complete
✓ 500+ calls successfully handled
✓ Operations team trained and confident
✓ Optimization process established
✓ Ongoing monitoring in place

---

★ Real Case Studies: Manufacturing Implementations

Case Study 1: Automotive Parts Manufacturer (200 employees)

Company Profile:

• Industry: Automotive aftermarket parts
• Location: Michigan, USA
• Employees: 200
• Annual Revenue: $45M
• Products: Brake components, suspension parts

The Problem:

Production scheduling chaos:

• 3 operations managers spending 18 hours/week each answering calls
• "When is order #X ready?" asked 40-60 times daily
• Customer service disconnected from ERP system
• 4-6 hour average response time for order status
• Manual ERP lookups causing errors (7% mistake rate)

Annual cost of manual process: $78,400

How Neuratel Solved This (11-Day Implementation):

Neuratel's Implementation Timeline:

• Day 1-3: Our integration team connected Epicor ERP + designed custom workflows
• Day 4-7: Our AI training team conducted optimization + 120 test call validation
• Day 8-10: Our pilot team managed controlled rollout (20% → 50% → 100% routing)
• Day 11-14: Our optimization team conducted full launch + daily performance tuning

Workflows Neuratel Automated:

1. Production scheduling status (55% of calls handled by our AI system)

   • Real-time ERP queries
   • Order location and timeline
   • Completion notifications

2. Expedite request routing (20% of calls)

   • Urgency assessment
   • Auto-route to production manager if feasible
   • Create expedite ticket in ERP

3. Quality hold inquiries (15% of calls)

   • QC status lookup
   • Hold release timeline
   • Re-inspection scheduling

Results After 90 Days:

Automation Metrics:

• 94% automation rate (production status queries)
• 6% transfer rate (complex expedites, technical issues)
• 2.3 minute average handling time (vs 4.5 minutes manual)
• 97% accuracy in order status lookups

Business Impact:

• 15.6 hours/week saved per operations manager (total 46.8 hrs/week)
• $68,250 annual labor savings
• Response time reduced from 4-6 hours to 2 minutes (real-time)
• Error rate reduced from 7% to 0.3% (99% fewer mistakes)
• Customer satisfaction increased from 3.8 to 4.6/5.0

ROI:

• Implementation cost: $14,500
• Annual benefit: $85,670 (labor + error reduction + productivity)
• Net benefit Year 1: $71,170
• ROI: 491%
• Payback period: 2.0 months

Operations Manager Quote:

"We went from phone tag nightmares to instant answers. Our team now focuses on actual production management instead of being phone receptionists. The AI is more accurate than we were manually."

---

Case Study 2: Electronics Contract Manufacturer (80 employees)

Company Profile:

• Industry: Electronics assembly (PCBs, medical devices)
• Location: California, USA
• Employees: 80
• Annual Revenue: $18M
• Certifications: ISO 9001, ISO 13485 (medical)

The Problem:

Supply chain coordination bottleneck:

• 2 supply chain coordinators spending 12 hours/week each on calls
• Vendor calls (delivery scheduling, PO status, documentation)
• Manual tracking across 3 systems (ERP, carrier websites, dock schedule)
• Missed delivery appointments causing production delays
• 8-10 minute average call duration

Annual cost of manual process: $32,600

How Neuratel Solved This (12-Day Multi-System Integration):

Neuratel's Implementation Timeline:

• Day 1-2: Our integration team connected NetSuite ERP + ShipStation + dock scheduling calendar
• Day 3-4: Our workflow design team created vendor coordination flows + delivery scheduling logic
• Day 5-7: Our AI training team optimized carrier integration + appointment booking
• Day 8-10: Our pilot team managed controlled vendor rollout (5 trusted vendors first)
• Day 11-14: Our launch team deployed full system to all vendors

Workflows Neuratel Automated:

1. Delivery appointment scheduling (40% of calls handled by our AI system)

   • Check dock availability (managed by our system)
   • Book time slots
   • Send confirmation emails
   • Update receiving calendar

2. Purchase order status inquiries (35% of calls)

   • PO lookup in ERP
   • Payment status
   • Outstanding items
   • Expected ship dates

3. Shipment tracking (25% of calls)

   • Real-time carrier tracking
   • Delivery exceptions
   • POD (Proof of Delivery) retrieval

Results After 90 Days:

Automation Metrics:

• 89% automation rate (routine vendor coordination)
• 11% transfer rate (price negotiations, quality issues)
• 4.2 minute average handling time (vs 8.5 minutes manual)
• 96% accuracy in PO lookups and scheduling

Business Impact:

• 10.7 hours/week saved per coordinator (total 21.4 hrs/week)
• $28,360 annual labor savings
• Zero missed delivery appointments (vs 8-12/year previously)
• Production delays reduced by 73% ($18,400 cost avoidance)
• Vendor satisfaction increased from 4.1 to 4.7/5.0

ROI:

• Implementation cost: $11,200
• Annual benefit: $46,760 (labor + delay prevention)
• Net benefit Year 1: $35,560
• ROI: 318%
• Payback period: 2.9 months

Supply Chain Manager Quote:

"Vendor coordination used to be constant interruptions. Now the AI handles 90% of it—scheduling, tracking, PO status. We focus on problem-solving, not phone answering. Delivery performance improved 73% because appointments are never missed."

---

Case Study 3: Industrial Equipment Manufacturer (500+ employees)

Company Profile:

• Industry: Heavy industrial equipment (conveyors, material handling)
• Location: Illinois, USA
• Employees: 520
• Annual Revenue: $180M
• Operations: 3 facilities, 24/7 maintenance support

The Problem:

Maintenance request chaos:

• 4 maintenance coordinators covering 24/7 on-call
• 20-35 urgent equipment failures per week
• 2-5 minute delay in creating work orders (while taking notes)
• Paging system disconnected from CMMS
• Average 8 minutes to dispatch technician after call received
• Critical downtime costing $12,000-$45,000 per hour

Annual cost of manual process: $156,000 (coordination labor + downtime delays)

How Neuratel Solved This (14-Day 24/7 Operations Launch):

Neuratel's Implementation Timeline:

• Day 1-3: Our integration team connected CMMS (Maximo) + mapped 2,400 asset equipment database
• Day 4-5: Our workflow design team created urgency triage logic + integrated technician paging system
• Day 6-8: Our AI training team optimized equipment terminology + error code recognition
• Day 9-11: Our pilot team managed night shift launch first, then 24/7 rollout
• Day 12-14: Our optimization team conducted full system tuning + performance validation

Workflows Neuratel Automated:

1. Emergency equipment failures (40% of calls handled by our AI system)

   • Immediate work order creation (automated by our system)
   • Automatic technician paging based on equipment type (managed by our system)
   • Production notification if line down (triggered by our system)
   • ETA communication to caller (provided by our AI agent)

2. Routine maintenance requests (35% of calls handled by our AI system)

   • Work order creation with priority assignment (automated by our system)
   • Scheduling based on technician availability (managed by our system)
   • Parts inventory check (handled by our system)
   • Preventive maintenance due date tracking (tracked by our system)

3. Maintenance status inquiries (25% of calls handled by our AI system)

   • Work order status lookup (provided by our AI agent)
   • Technician ETA updates (communicated by our AI agent)
   • Parts availability confirmation (verified by our system)
   • Completion notifications (automated by our system)

Results After 90 Days:

Automation Metrics:

• 96% automation rate (work order creation + technician dispatch)
• 4% transfer rate (safety emergencies, contractor coordination)
• 2.1 minute average handling time (vs 8.0 minutes manual)
• 99% accuracy in equipment identification and routing

Business Impact:

• 18.2 hours/week saved per coordinator (total 72.8 hrs/week across 4 coordinators)
• $148,200 annual labor savings
• Technician dispatch time reduced from 8 minutes to 90 seconds (6.5 minutes faster)
• Critical downtime reduced by 42% ($287,000 annual cost avoidance)
• Emergency response time improved from 18 minutes to 6 minutes (67% faster)
• Maintenance satisfaction increased from 3.9 to 4.8/5.0

ROI:

• Implementation cost: $38,000
• Annual benefit: $435,200 (labor + downtime prevention)
• Net benefit Year 1: $397,200
• ROI: 423% (conservative 12-month calculation)
• Payback period: 2.1 months (implementation costs recovered through labor and downtime savings)

Maintenance Director Quote:

"Emergency response time dropped from 18 minutes to 6 minutes. When a $3 million production line goes down, every minute costs $12,000. The AI eliminates the phone call delay—instant work order, instant technician page, instant action. Within 2-3 months, downtime reduction alone pays for implementation."

---

✗ 6 Common Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)

Mistake 1: Starting with Quality Control Instead of Production Scheduling

The Error:

Attempting to automate the MOST COMPLEX use case first (quality defect analysis requiring technical judgment) instead of the HIGHEST VOLUME simple use case (production status inquiries).

Why It Fails:

• Quality control involves nuance, judgment, and technical expertise
• AI accuracy: 70-78% for complex QC scenarios
• High transfer rate frustrates callers
• Team loses confidence in AI capabilities

The Fix:

Start Simple, Scale Up:

1. Week 1-2: Production scheduling status (95%+ automation rate)
2. Week 3-4: Supply chain tracking (92%+ automation rate)
3. Week 5-6: Maintenance work order creation (96%+ automation rate)
4. Week 7-8: Quality control TRIAGE (route to specialists, don't diagnose)
5. Week 9-10: Vendor coordination (routine scheduling, not negotiations)

Success Pattern:

Build confidence with easy wins, then tackle complex workflows incrementally.

Reddit Validation:

"We tried automating our most complex process first. 6 months of training, still stuck at 70% accuracy. Switched to simple FAQs, went live in 5 days." (156 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

---

Mistake 2: No ERP Integration (Manual Data Entry Nightmare)

The Error:

AI takes the call, captures information, but then requires humans to manually enter data into ERP, CMMS, or other systems.

Why It Fails:

• Eliminates 80% of time savings (call handling is 20%, data entry is 80%)
• Introduces errors (manual transcription from AI notes to ERP)
• Creates bottlenecks (humans become data entry clerks)
• Defeats the purpose (automation that creates more work)

The Fix:

Integration is Mandatory:

1. ERP API connection: Real-time order lookups, status updates
2. CMMS integration: Automatic work order creation, technician paging
3. Calendar sync: Delivery scheduling, appointment booking
4. CRM updates: Interaction logging, customer history

Success Checklist:

✓ AI queries data from source systems (no manual lookups)
✓ AI creates records automatically (work orders, tickets, appointments)
✓ AI updates systems in real-time (status changes, notes, assignments)
✓ Zero manual data entry required

Reddit Validation:

"AI without integration is just an expensive phone answering service. We spent $12K on implementation but didn't integrate ERP. Ended up with 5 hours/day of copy-paste work." (234 upvotes, r/ERP)

---

Mistake 3: Skipping the Pilot Phase (Launch to 100% Traffic on Day 1)

The Error:

Routing 100% of production calls to AI on Day 1 without testing with real callers in a controlled pilot.

Why It Fails:

• Untested edge cases cause failures in production
• Caller frustration if AI misunderstands common requests
• No opportunity to optimize before full-scale launch
• Team panic when issues arise under full load

The Fix:

Pilot Strategy (3-Day Approach):

Day 1: 20% Traffic

• Route 1 in 5 calls to AI
• Monitor every call in real-time
• Team on standby for issues
• Collect 15-25 sample calls

Day 2: 50% Traffic

• Increase to half of calls
• Analyze patterns from Day 1
• Optimize scripts and flows
• Collect 50-80 sample calls

Day 3: 100% Traffic (Specific Use Cases)

• Full routing for simple workflows only
• Keep complex scenarios human-handled
• Continue monitoring and optimization
• Collect 100-150 sample calls

Success Metrics:

• ≥90% successful completion rate
• <15% transfer rate to humans
• 4.0+/5.0 caller satisfaction
• Zero critical errors

Reddit Validation:

"Launched AI to 100% traffic Day 1. Disaster. 40% transfer rate, angry callers, team overwhelmed. Rolled back, did proper pilot, went smooth." (89 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

---

Mistake 4: "Set and Forget" Mentality (No Ongoing Optimization)

The Error:

Treating AI implementation as a one-time project instead of an ongoing optimization process.

Why It Fails:

• AI gets stuck at 70-80% accuracy (needs weekly tuning to reach 95%+)
• New scenarios emerge that AI hasn't been trained on
• Business processes change but AI workflows don't
• Caller frustration increases as edge cases accumulate

The Fix:

30-Day Optimization Cycle:

Week 1:

• Daily call reviews (identify failures)
• Adjust scripts based on real usage
• Add new intents discovered in production
• Target: 85% accuracy

Week 2:

• Analyze transfer patterns
• Optimize escalation triggers
• Improve response wording
• Target: 90% accuracy

Week 3:

• Add complex workflows incrementally
• Enhance personalization
• Reduce handling time
• Target: 93% accuracy

Week 4:

• Fine-tune edge cases
• Optimize system integrations
• Measure ROI and impact
• Target: 95%+ accuracy

Ongoing (Monthly):

• Performance review (accuracy, transfers, satisfaction)
• New use case additions
• Script updates based on feedback
• Continuous improvement

Reddit Validation:

"Our AI was stuck at 72% accuracy for months. Started weekly optimization sessions, hit 94% in 30 days. It's not set-and-forget." (178 upvotes, r/machinelearning)

---

Mistake 5: IT-Only Implementation (No Operations Team Involvement)

The Error:

IT department implements AI voice agent without involving operations managers, production leads, or maintenance coordinators.

Why It Fails:

• Workflows don't match reality (IT guesses, gets it wrong)
• Missing domain expertise (technical terminology, escalation paths)
• Poor adoption (operations team feels excluded, resists using it)
• Inaccurate scripts (doesn't sound like how real conversations happen)

The Fix:

Cross-Functional Implementation Team:

Required Roles:

1. IT Lead (30% involvement)

   • Technical integration
   • API setup and testing
   • Security and access control
   • System monitoring

2. Operations Manager (50% involvement)

   • Workflow design (how calls should flow)
   • Script writing (what AI should say)
   • Testing and validation
   • Team training

3. Subject Matter Experts (20% involvement)

   • Domain terminology (equipment names, error codes)
   • Escalation criteria (when to transfer to human)
   • Edge case scenarios
   • Process documentation

Collaboration Model:

• Day 1-3: Joint requirements gathering (IT + Ops)
• Day 4-7: IT builds, Ops reviews and tests
• Day 8-10: Ops leads pilot testing with IT support
• Day 11-14: Joint optimization and launch

Reddit Validation:

"IT built our AI without talking to operations. Lasted 2 weeks before we killed it. Complete disaster. Second attempt with Ops leading—92% adoption in 48 hours." (267 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

---

Mistake 6: Unclear "Press 0 for Human" Policy (Trap Callers in AI Loop)

The Error:

Not providing a clear, immediate escape path to reach a human agent when needed.

Why It Fails:

• Caller frustration (trapped in AI loop for complex issues)
• Negative reviews ("Company doesn't care, forces you to talk to robot")
• Lost business (customers hang up and call competitors)
• Legal/safety risks (urgent issues not escalated)

The Fix:

Mandatory Escape Path:

Implementation Rules:

1. Always announce option: "At any time, say 'operator' or press 0 to speak with a person."
2. Immediate transfer: No additional questions, no "let me try to help" loops
3. Context transfer: Pass caller information and conversation history to human
4. No judgment: Track transfers but don't penalize human escalations

When to Automatically Transfer:

• Caller frustration detected (raised voice, profanity, repeated requests)
• Safety or emergency situations
• Complex technical troubleshooting
• Requests outside AI capabilities
• After 2 failed intent recognitions

Success Metrics:

• <15% transfer rate (if higher, AI needs optimization)
• <30 second wait time for human transfer
• 4.5+/5.0 satisfaction for transferred calls

Reddit Validation:

"Our first AI didn't let you reach a human easily. Customers HATED it. Added 'press 0 anytime' option, satisfaction went from 2.8 to 4.4." (412 upvotes, r/customerservice)

---

⚒ Integration Requirements: Manufacturing Systems

ERP Systems (Enterprise Resource Planning)

Common Platforms:

• SAP (large enterprises)

  • Integration method: SAP API (OData, REST)
  • Setup time: 2-3 days
  • Complexity: High (authentication, data mapping)

• Oracle NetSuite (mid-market)

  • Integration method: SuiteTalk API (SOAP/REST)
  • Setup time: 1-2 days
  • Complexity: Medium

• Microsoft Dynamics 365 (mid-market)

  • Integration method: Web API (OData)
  • Setup time: 1-2 days
  • Complexity: Medium

• Epicor (manufacturing-specific)

  • Integration method: REST API
  • Setup time: 1-2 days
  • Complexity: Medium-Low

• Infor CloudSuite (industrial)

  • Integration method: ION API
  • Setup time: 2-3 days
  • Complexity: Medium-High

Required API Capabilities:

✓ Read operations:

• Order status and details
• Customer information
• Production schedules
• Inventory levels
• Purchase order status

✓ Write operations:

• Update order notes
• Create customer interactions
• Flag urgent requests
• Update delivery schedules

---

CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System)

Common Platforms:

• IBM Maximo (enterprise)

  • Integration method: REST API
  • Setup time: 2-3 days
  • Complexity: High

• SAP PM (SAP ecosystem)

  • Integration method: SAP API
  • Setup time: 2-3 days
  • Complexity: High

• Fiix (cloud-based)

  • Integration method: REST API
  • Setup time: 1 day
  • Complexity: Low

• UpKeep (mobile-first)

  • Integration method: REST API
  • Setup time: 1 day
  • Complexity: Low

• Maintenance Connection (mid-market)

  • Integration method: API + webhooks
  • Setup time: 1-2 days
  • Complexity: Medium

Required API Capabilities:

✓ Read operations:

• Work order status
• Technician availability
• Equipment/asset details
• Maintenance history
• Parts inventory

✓ Write operations:

• Create work orders
• Assign technicians
• Update priorities
• Add notes/photos
• Close completed work

---

Shipping/Logistics Systems

Common Platforms:

• ShipStation (e-commerce focused)

  • Integration method: REST API
  • Setup time: 1 day
  • Complexity: Low

• Freightview (LTL/FTL freight)

  • Integration method: API + carrier integrations
  • Setup time: 1-2 days
  • Complexity: Medium

• 3PL Central (third-party logistics)

  • Integration method: REST API
  • Setup time: 1-2 days
  • Complexity: Medium

• Direct Carrier APIs (FedEx, UPS, DHL)

  • Integration method: Carrier-specific APIs
  • Setup time: 2-3 days (per carrier)
  • Complexity: Medium-High

Required API Capabilities:

✓ Read operations:

• Shipment tracking status
• Delivery estimates
• Proof of delivery (POD)
• Exception alerts

✓ Write operations:

• Schedule pickups
• Update addresses
• Request delivery holds

---

☎ 10 Frequently Asked Questions

1. How long does implementation actually take?

Answer:

7-14 days for basic automation (production scheduling, supply chain tracking, maintenance requests).

Timeline Breakdown:

• Days 1-3: Discovery, integration setup, workflow design
• Days 4-7: AI training, configuration, internal testing
• Days 8-10: Pilot launch (20% → 50% → 100% traffic)
• Days 11-14: Full launch + optimization

30 days to reach 95%+ accuracy through weekly optimization cycles.

Factors affecting timeline:

• Faster (7-10 days): Cloud ERP with modern APIs, single facility, simple workflows
• Slower (12-14 days): Legacy on-premise systems, multiple facilities, complex custom workflows

---

2. What's the minimum call volume to justify AI?

Answer:

50+ calls per week (10+ per day) is the break-even point where ROI makes sense.

ROI by Call Volume:

• 50 calls/week: $8,900 annual savings, 18-month payback
• 150 calls/week: $32,400 annual savings, 5-month payback
• 500 calls/week: $104,700 annual savings, 2-month payback

Below 50 calls/week: Consider starting with a single high-value use case (e.g., after-hours emergency maintenance) rather than full automation.

---

3. Will AI work with our legacy ERP system?

Answer:

Yes, if your ERP has ANY of these:

✓ REST or SOAP API (most common)
✓ Database access (SQL queries)
✓ File export/import (CSV, XML, JSON)
✓ Third-party integration platform (Zapier, n8n, MuleSoft)

95% of ERP systems implemented since 2000 have some form of API access.

For systems without APIs:

• Database connector: Direct SQL queries to ERP database
• Screen scraping: Automated UI interaction (last resort)
• Middleware: Integration platform translates between systems

Legacy system support:

• AS/400 / IBM i systems: Yes (via ODBC or REST APIs)
• Custom-built ERP: Yes (if database accessible)
• Excel-based systems: Yes (via file integration)

---

###4. Can AI handle technical manufacturing terminology?

Answer:

Yes, with proper training (2-3 days).

AI learns your vocabulary:

• Equipment names ("CNC Machine 7," "Line 3 Extruder")
• Part numbers and SKUs ("Widget-X-789," "Assembly-ABC-456")
• Error codes ("E-47 spindle fault," "Alarm 203")
• Process terminology ("annealing," "shot peening," "electroplating")
• Industry jargon ("batch traceability," "first article inspection")

Training process:

1. Day 1: Upload sample conversations, product catalogs, equipment lists
2. Day 2: AI learns patterns, tests against historical calls
3. Day 3: Subject matter experts validate accuracy (85%+ target)

Ongoing improvement:

• AI learns new terms from each call
• Weekly reviews add missing vocabulary
• 90 days to reach 95%+ terminology accuracy

Reddit Validation:

"Thought AI wouldn't understand our specialized aerospace terminology. Trained it in 2 days, now it's more accurate than our junior coordinators." (89 upvotes, r/aerospace)

---

5. What happens if AI doesn't understand the caller?

Answer:

Immediate escalation to human (no loops, no frustration).

Escalation Triggers:

• Intent recognition confidence <70%: "Let me connect you with a specialist."
• Repeated rephrasing: After 2 attempts, transfer to human
• Caller requests human: "Press 0 or say 'operator' anytime"
• Complex/unusual request: Auto-route to appropriate department
• Caller frustration detected: Immediate transfer

Context Transfer:

When AI transfers, the human receives:

• Caller information (name, company, phone)
• Conversation transcript
• Attempted intent classification
• System data already retrieved (order #, equipment ID, etc.)

Success Metrics:

• <15% transfer rate (if higher, AI needs optimization)
• <30 second wait time for human
• 4.5+/5.0 satisfaction for transferred calls

---

6. Is AI available 24/7, or only business hours?

Answer:

24/7/365 availability is standard (no additional cost).

After-Hours Value:

Manufacturing environments often have:

• Night shifts: Production scheduling, maintenance requests
• Weekend operations: Supply chain tracking, emergency support
• Global customers: Different time zones need instant answers

After-Hours Use Cases:

• Emergency equipment failures (24/7 maintenance paging)
• Night shift production status inquiries
• Weekend delivery scheduling
• International vendor coordination

Human Escalation After-Hours:

• Emergency paging: AI pages on-call technician/manager
• Voicemail capture: Detailed message + email notification
• Ticket creation: Issue logged for next business day follow-up

Result: 35-40% of manufacturing calls happen outside regular business hours—AI captures ALL of them.

---

7. How much does it cost monthly?

Answer:

$499-$1,499/month platform subscription (depending on call volume and features).

Pricing Breakdown:

Small Facility (50-200 calls/month):

• Platform: $499/month
• Usage: $0.25/minute (avg 3 min/call) = $37.50-$150/month
• Total: $536-$649/month

Medium Facility (200-800 calls/month):

• Platform: $899/month
• Usage: $0.20/minute (volume discount) = $120-$480/month
• Total: $1,019-$1,379/month

Large Facility (800+ calls/month):

• Platform: $1,499/month
• Usage: $0.15/minute (volume discount) = $360+/month
• Total: $1,859+/month (custom pricing available)

One-Time Setup Fees:

• Platform configuration: $2,500-$10,000
• ERP/CMMS integration: $3,000-$18,000
• Training and testing: $1,500-$8,000

No hidden fees: Transparent pricing, month-to-month contracts, no usage caps.

---

8. What if our team resists using AI?

Answer:

Cross-functional involvement = 92% adoption. IT-only implementation = 45% adoption.

Change Management Strategy:

Phase 1: Involve Early (Day 1)

• Operations managers design workflows (not IT dictating)
• Subject matter experts provide terminology and escalation rules
• Team members test and provide feedback BEFORE launch

Phase 2: Show Quick Wins (Week 1)

• Start with workflows team hates most ("endless 'where's my order' calls")
• Demonstrate time savings immediately (15-20 hrs/week freed up)
• Celebrate team successes publicly

Phase 3: Continuous Feedback (Ongoing)

• Weekly team debriefs (what's working, what needs improvement)
• Team-requested enhancements prioritized
• AI as tool that empowers, not replaces

Objection Handling:

"AI will replace my job"

• Reality: AI handles repetitive queries, humans do complex problem-solving
• Result: Operations managers spend time on actual operations, not phone answering
• Evidence: Zero job losses in 40+ manufacturing implementations

"AI won't understand our business"

• Solution: Team trains AI on specific terminology and workflows
• Result: AI learns from team expertise, becomes more accurate over time
• Evidence: 95%+ accuracy after 30 days of team-guided optimization

Reddit Validation:

"Our team was skeptical. Involved them from Day 1, let them design workflows. Launch day they were proud, not scared. 94% adoption in 48 hours." (178 upvotes, r/manufacturing)

---

9. Can AI integrate with our phone system?

Answer:

Yes—AI works with virtually all phone systems.

Supported Systems:

✓ Cloud Phone Systems:

• RingCentral
• 8x8
• Vonage Business
• Zoom Phone
• Microsoft Teams (calling)

✓ SIP/VoIP Systems:

• Any SIP-compliant system
• Twilio
• Plivo
• Bandwidth

✓ Traditional PBX:

• Avaya
• Cisco
• Mitel
• NEC
• (via SIP gateway)

Integration Methods:

1. Call forwarding: Forward specific lines to AI (easiest, 1-hour setup)
2. SIP trunk: Direct integration with phone system (2-3 hours setup)
3. IVR menu: "Press 1 for production, press 2 for maintenance" routes to AI
4. Number porting: Transfer existing numbers to AI platform (1-2 days)

No Phone System Disruption:

• Existing phones continue working
• No hardware changes required
• No employee retraining needed
• Rollback possible if needed

---

10. What ongoing maintenance does AI require?

Answer:

2-3 hours per month after initial 30-day optimization period.

Monthly Maintenance Tasks:

Week 1 of Month (60 minutes):

• Review previous month's performance metrics
• Analyze transfer patterns (identify optimization opportunities)
• Review caller satisfaction scores
• Update team on AI performance

Week 2-3 (30-60 minutes):

• Add new vocabulary/terminology as needed
• Update workflows if business processes changed
• Test new integrations if systems updated
• Review and address edge cases

Week 4 (30 minutes):

• Plan next month's enhancements
• Document lessons learned
• Celebrate wins with team

Platform Provider Support:

• Proactive monitoring (alerts for issues)
• Automatic software updates
• 24/7 technical support
• Quarterly optimization reviews

No Technical Expertise Required:

• Admin dashboard is user-friendly
• Operations managers can make most updates
• IT involvement only for major system changes

---

▲ Next Steps: Get Started with Manufacturing AI

Option 1: Book a Platform Demo (30 minutes)

See manufacturing-specific workflows in action:

• Live demo of production scheduling automation
• Real ERP integration examples (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics, Epicor)
• Call flow walkthroughs for your specific use cases
• ROI calculator customized to your facility size
• Implementation timeline for your environment

Book Demo: 213-213-5115

---

Option 2: Request Custom Implementation Roadmap (Free)

Get a detailed plan for YOUR facility:

• Call volume analysis and use case prioritization
• ERP/CMMS integration assessment
• Team requirements and timeline
• Cost estimate and ROI projection
• Risk assessment and mitigation plan

Request Roadmap: info@neuratel.ai

---

Option 3: Download Manufacturing Use Case Guide (PDF)

Complete reference document including:

• 25+ manufacturing-specific call flow examples
• ERP integration checklist for 10 platforms
• CMMS integration guide
• Team training templates
• Optimization playbook

Download Guide →

---

▪ Key Takeaways Summary

✓ Manufacturing environments are IDEAL for AI voice agents (structured workflows, predictable patterns, clear escalation paths)

✓ 5 critical use cases: Production scheduling (35%), Supply chain (28%), Quality control (15%), Maintenance (12%), Vendor coordination (10%)

✓ 7-14 day implementation for basic automation, 30 days to reach 95%+ accuracy

✓ $89K-$340K annual savings depending on facility size (50 employees vs 500+ employees)

✓ Start simple: Production scheduling and maintenance first, NOT quality control

✓ ERP integration is MANDATORY: No manual data entry, real-time queries, automatic updates

✓ Cross-functional team required: IT + Operations + Subject matter experts (not IT-only)

✓ Pilot testing is critical: 20% → 50% → 100% traffic over 3 days (not 100% on Day 1)

✓ Ongoing optimization required: Weekly reviews for 30 days, then monthly maintenance

✓ "Press 0 for human" must be immediate: No loops, no forced AI interaction

Manufacturing operations teams waste 15-25 hours per week on repetitive phone calls. Neuratel automates 87% of this work in 7-14 days.

Neuratel's Manufacturing Implementation:

✓ We Build: Our integration team connects your ERP/CMMS systems
✓ We Launch: Our pilot team manages your controlled rollout
✓ We Maintain: Our optimization team conducts ongoing tuning
✓ You Monitor: Track automation rates in your real-time dashboard
✓ You Control: Month-to-month pricing, no long-term contracts

The technology works. The ROI is proven. The implementation is fast.

---

Ready to automate your manufacturing operations? Request Custom Quote: Call (213) 213-5115 or email info@neuratel.ai

We handle everything from integration to optimization.